Where GX Creates the Most Value
A data-driven analysis of 201 countries and territories.
Global Impact at a Glance
Countries scored
196 sovereign nations + 5 territories
Tier 2: Strong Impact
Lebanon, South Sudan, Micronesia, Libya, Palestine, Tajikistan
Tier 2+3: High Impact
6 Tier 2 + 62 Tier 3 (Moderate Impact)
Total allocated
75.6% of 1.25T pool, treasury + individual
The countries where GX matters most are not the poorest or the richest, but those at the intersection of high financial exclusion and sufficient digital infrastructure.
The Global Impact Index ranks every country by combining a Need Score (60% weight) with a Readiness Score (40% weight). Need captures how urgently a population requires an alternative monetary system. Readiness measures the practical capacity to adopt one.
Global Impact Map
Countries colored by GX Impact Index tier. Tap any country for full details.
Top 20 by Impact Index
The GX Impact Index combines a Need Score (60% weight) and a Readiness Score (40% weight) to rank every country by where the protocol can deliver the most measurable benefit.
Government Treasury Allocation
Top 20 countries by total protocol allocation at genesis calibration (1 GX = 1 gram of gold).
Full Country Dataset
201 countries and territories scored across 10 socioeconomic variables. Click any country for full details.
| # | Country | Score | Tier |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lebanon | 71.4 | Tier 2 |
| 2 | South Sudan | 67.4 | Tier 2 |
| 3 | Micronesia, Fed. Sts. | 66.5 | Tier 2 |
| 4 | Libya | 63.3 | Tier 2 |
| 5 | Palestine | 63.3 | Tier 2 |
| 6 | Tajikistan | 60.4 | Tier 2 |
| 7 | Marshall Islands | 59.5 | Tier 3 |
| 8 | Nicaragua | 59.4 | Tier 3 |
| 9 | El Salvador | 59.3 | Tier 3 |
| 10 | Myanmar | 59.0 | Tier 3 |
| 11 | Kyrgyz Republic | 55.1 | Tier 3 |
| 12 | Argentina | 54.5 | Tier 3 |
| 13 | Montenegro | 54.5 | Tier 3 |
| 14 | Morocco | 54.5 | Tier 3 |
| 15 | Gambia, The | 53.8 | Tier 3 |
| 16 | Suriname | 53.7 | Tier 3 |
| 17 | Tunisia | 53.1 | Tier 3 |
| 18 | Turkmenistan | 52.7 | Tier 3 |
| 19 | Uzbekistan | 52.3 | Tier 3 |
| 20 | Somalia, Fed. Rep. | 51.8 | Tier 3 |
| 21 | Iran, Islamic Rep. | 51.0 | Tier 3 |
| 22 | Colombia | 50.8 | Tier 3 |
| 23 | Egypt, Arab Rep. | 50.6 | Tier 3 |
| 24 | Honduras | 50.6 | Tier 3 |
| 25 | Georgia | 50.5 | Tier 3 |
| 26 | Cambodia | 50.4 | Tier 3 |
| 27 | Guatemala | 50.4 | Tier 3 |
| 28 | Jamaica | 50.4 | Tier 3 |
| 29 | Nepal | 50.4 | Tier 3 |
| 30 | Lao PDR | 49.8 | Tier 3 |
How the Index Is Calculated
Two composite scores, ten data-driven indicators, one transparent formula.
Need Score (60% weight)
Measures how urgently a population needs an alternative monetary system.
- Unbanked population15%
- Remittance cost12%
- Remittance dependency10%
- Currency instability13%
- Fiscal stress10%
Readiness Score (40% weight)
Measures the practical capacity of a population to adopt a digital monetary system.
- Mobile penetration15%
- Internet access10%
- Population scale5%
- Relative grant impact5%
- Demographic profile5%
Tier Classification
Tier 2
60-74
Strong Impact
6 countries
Tier 3
45-59
Moderate Impact
62 countries
Tier 4
30-44
Strategic Impact
97 countries
Tier 5
0-29
Adoption-Led
36 countries
Explore the Full Protocol
Understand the economic model, architecture, and vision behind the GX Coin Protocol.